Artistic Form in King Lear Essays -- essays research papers fc

King Lear has remained one of Shakespeares outstrip works, and one of the best tragedies of all time, since the beginning of the 17th century however, some early critics believe that certain elements of the story do not satisfy the criteria for a proper tragedy. The cardinal plot elements under speculation are the subplot and the catastrophic ending. The primary focus of the story is set on the elderly King Lear, whose pride and greed blinds him, do him to banish his only pure daughter, Cordelia, along with his most loyal subject, Kent. He bestows his force play and land upon his ungrateful daughters Regan and Goneril, who immediately plot to strip him of the remainder of his power as well as his pride. A similar subplot emerges where the Earl of Gloucester is duped by his Don John-esque bastard son, Edmund, into banishing his real son, Edgar. Both fathers realize their misjudgments ahead the end, but not before their downfalls. The play ends with the gradual insanity and death of Lear, as well as the deaths of Cordelia, Regan, Goneril, Gloucester, and Edmund. The intellectual ending or poetic arbitrator is never achieved and the only expulsion to the seeming lack of justice is the pronouncement of the loyal Edgar as King, and the inferred bright future. The earliest record of a criticism of King Lear is a letter from the Irish playwright Nahum Tate to a friend, written in 1681. In the letter, Tate describes King Lear as a Heap of Jewels, unstrung and unpolisht. He describes in detail how he plans to process several major elements of the story, adding a love affair between Edgar and Cordelia, rescuing Lear and Cordelia from execution, omitting The Fool (a source of wisdom as well as comic relief), and establishing poetic justice at the plays end. Tate proposes these changes in order to rectifie what was wanting in the Regularity and Probability of King Lear. He also reasoned that the audience would like a happy ending where justice and virtue prevaile d. His reworking of the tale complies with the strict Neoclassical formula that was expected at the time. Tates predictions proved correct when his altered version overshadowed the original for over a century. (Tate 344-45) (SC2 92)During the 18th Century, the controversy over the ending of King Lear continues as well as new controversy over Tates rewritten ending. tyro Joseph Addison... ...s it unstoppable once it has been let loose. (Stampfer 3) The 20th century marked a period of speculation of the intent behind plot elements, specifically the ending. The style and body structure of Shakespeares writing is no longer questioned as it is in earlier criticisms of King Lear. King Lear is one of the most debatable plays ever written because the situations that hoist are the result of the complex relationships between qualitys and the judgments that these characters make. The structure, especially the unexpected ending, is ahead of its time, and the meaning behind the ending is ar guable. King Lears unique character relationships and structure are the reasons that it is still a popular topic in literary criticism. Works CitedGale Research CompanyShakespearean Criticism Vol. 2Kansas City, minute Typographics Inc. 1985.Moss, Joyce Wilson, George Overview King Lear, by William ShakespeareLiterature and its times Profiles of 300 notable Literary Events and the Historical Events that Influenced Them. 1997.Literature Resource Center. 9 March 2005. Price, Thomas King Lear A Study of Shakespeares Dramatic MethodPMLA, Vol.9 No.2 1894 Jstor 9 March 2005.